However, they're probably related to this problem:
% CLEAN_ITER_STRUCT: There were 1 bolometers with high weights: 13.5047 indices: 142 or flagged indices 142
which indicates that in a simulation in which there can be no outliers (in terms of weight/scale), there is one being rejected as an outlier. That indicates that weights are being computed incorrectly, despite the fact that scales look right (so far):
Relsens calibration: Scaled to bolometer # 0
% RELSENS_CAL_PCA: There were 0 NAN scales and 0 very low scales
% RELSENS_CAL_PCA: Scale Median/Mad: 1.0005510+/- 0.010990833 led to 0 scales set to zero for a total of 0 bad bolos
% RELSENS_CAL_PCA: Scales avg+/-std = 1.0007304355062783+/- 0.0103252880998329
Relsens calibration: Scaled to bolometer # 0
% RELSENS_CAL_PCA: There were 0 NAN scales and 0 very low scales
% RELSENS_CAL_PCA: Scale Median/Mad: 0.99955294+/- 0.0093122063 led to 0 scales set to zero for a total of 0 bad bolos
% RELSENS_CAL_PCA: Scales avg+/-std = 0.9990063123041220+/- 0.0096663438876613
No comments:
Post a Comment