PEAK COMPARISON BL: 5.95824 noBL: 3.09836 uranus_050619_o23
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 3.93725 noBL: 2.85479 uranus_050619_o24
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 15.5613 noBL: 523.035 neptune_050626_o19
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 16.4601 noBL: 16.0038 neptune_050626_o20
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 426.671 noBL: 375.174 mars_050627_o31
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 415.968 noBL: 413.327 mars_050627_o32
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 15.2464 noBL: 33.8593 uranus_050628_o33
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 34.6631 noBL: 35.5086 uranus_050628_o34
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 164.832 noBL: 403.189 uranus_050904_o31
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 216.820 noBL: 425.613 uranus_050904_o32
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 134.972 noBL: 156.196 uranus_050911_ob8
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 11.0957 noBL: 11.1993 neptune_060602_o30
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 12.0000 noBL: 11.0947 neptune_060602_o31
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 2478.20 noBL: 2365.17 mars_060605_ob1
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 2144.68 noBL: 2147.18 mars_060605_ob2
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 17.7354 noBL: 25.7041 uranus_060621_o29
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 18.7889 noBL: 25.6599 uranus_060621_o30
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 28.1957 noBL: 31.1013 uranus_060625_o46
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 23.0236 noBL: 27.8556 uranus_060905_ob6
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 18.8731 noBL: 28.4964 uranus_060906_o12
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 23.3481 noBL: 29.8294 uranus_060908_o13
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 20.6238 noBL: 26.9424 uranus_060909_o12
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 21.1049 noBL: 28.8533 uranus_060910_o12
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 24.0231 noBL: 32.0877 uranus_060914_o10
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 23.2590 noBL: 33.3496 uranus_060914_o11
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 24.0538 noBL: 30.0552 uranus_060919_ob9
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 355.467 noBL: 669.416 g34.3_070630_o34
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 246.803 noBL: 296.252 g34.3_070630_o35
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 724.874 noBL: 807.152 uranus_070702_o42
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 7.60370 noBL: 9.02960 uranus_070912_o27
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 98.8058 noBL: 88.9957 mars_070913_o22
PEAK COMPARISON BL: 82.2708 noBL: 89.3476 mars_070913_o23
Friday, January 30, 2009
beam locations & peak fluxes
The results of my distortion mapping work below. Note that, especially for 06, there are a LOT of cases where no beam locations correction (noBL) had a higher peak than the distortion corrected map. I have no explanation for this yet. More work to come...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment